How qualified is Dr. Strang to be advising parents about measles and vaccinations?

.

In 2007, Dr. Strang was the appointed Chief Medical Officer of Health, CMOH of Nova Scotia.

What was the wealth of his experience and training that got him this important job, and qualifies him to advise us on, and mandate medical treatments?

In the early 1980s Robert Strang played for the Canada men’s national rugby union team. In 1994, Strang became a team doctor for the Canada men’s national rugby union team.[2] From 1997 to 1999, Strang was an Associate Medical Officer of Health in the Canadian province of British Columbia.[4] In 1999, Strang moved to Nova Scotia,[2] and continued his career in Halifax, Nova Scotia, where he became the Medical Officer of Health of Capital District Health Authority,[4]. …In 2007, Strang was appointed Chief Public Health Official of Nova Scotia. (Wikipedia)

That’s it folks. He polished up the handle so carefully that now he is the Ruler of the Nova Scotia Health Authority. While it is nice for the doctor to continue his career, it was not as an epidemiologist, virologist, expert in infectious diseases, pediatrician, family doctor, nor naturopath. He has specialties in administration, but he has never had a practice seeing little Johnny for a rash or sore throat, or worse.

Highly alarming is that Dr. Strang is not admonishing caution by virtue of his own personal experience. Tragically this father has an adolescent son with severe autism. Although the MMR vaccines are notorious, among vaccines, in the literature* and in experience* for causing sudden onset neurological damage, and death, Dr. Strang is blithely admonishing parents to sign their children and babies up. (It’s really unbelievable.)

“There is no harm in getting a booster”. “They are safe”. This is woefully inaccurate. All parents thinking about vaccinating should be thoroughly acquainted the monograph of the Merck Mumps Measles and Rubella Vaccine (M-M-R® II) used in Canada.

Are Dr. Strang and his fleet of public health vaccinators making this required reading, for mothers and fathers, (and administering staff)? Are they alerting parents of these factors, for example (from the monograph)?:

  • “Women of childbearing age should be advised not to become pregnant for one month after vaccination and should be informed on the reasons for this precaution.”
  • “Excretion of small amounts of the live attenuated rubella virus from the nose or throat has occurred in the majority of susceptible individuals 7 to 28 days after vaccination.”
  • “Immune and Hypersensitivity: Live measles vaccine and live mumps vaccine are produced in chick embryo cell culture. Persons with a history of anaphylactic, anaphylactoid or other immediate reactions (e.g., hives, swelling of the mouth and throat, difficulty breathing, hypotension, or shock) subsequent to egg ingestion may be at an enhanced risk of immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions after receiving vaccines containing traces of chick embryo antigen. The potential risk to benefit ratio should be carefully evaluated before considering vaccination in such cases. Such individuals may be vaccinated with extreme caution, having adequate treatment on hand should a reaction occur.”
  • “There are no adequate studies of the attenuated (vaccine) strain of measles virus in pregnancy. However, it would be prudent to assume that the vaccine strain of virus is also capable of inducing adverse fetal effects.”
  • “Nursing Women: It is not known whether measles or mumps vaccine virus is secreted in human milk. Recent studies have shown that lactating postpartum women immunized with live attenuated rubella vaccine may secrete the virus in breast milk and transmit it to breast-fed infants.”
  • “…425 women received M-M-R® II vaccine during the 30 days prior to conception through the second trimester. The outcomes for these 425 prospectively followed pregnancies included 16 infants with major birth defects, 4 cases of fetal death and 50 cases of miscarriage;”

ADVERSE REACTIONS:

Nervous/Psychiatric Febrile convulsions in children, afebrile convulsions or seizures, headache, dizziness, paresthesia, polyneuritis, polyneuropathy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, ataxia, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), transverse myelitis, aseptic meningitis (see below), measles inclusion body encephalitis (MIBE), syncope.

Respiratory System Pneumonia, pneumonitis, cough, rhinitis.

Skin Erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, Henoch-Schönlein purpura, Acute Hemorrhagic Edema of Infancy, vesiculation at injection site, swelling, pruritus.

Special Senses Forms of optic neuritis, including retrobulbar neuritis, papillitis, and retinitis; ocular palsies, otitis media, nerve deafness, conjunctivitis.

Death from various, and in some cases unknown, causes has been reported rarely following vaccination with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines;

Recently the CDC, Centre of Diseases Control, released 2022 data showing 1/31 children having a diagnosis of autism. Despite more than 214 research papers supporting the autism-vaccine link, and the testimony of 10,000’s of distraught parents, Dr. Strang is only doubling down on his questionable vaccines = health policies.

These statistics are now, in fact, three years behind in the accelerating trend. Of these children 1/<31, 25% are SEVERELY AUTISTIC. Is the CMOH on board with RFK’s priority to find out the causes of autism by September? Is he being proactive in examining implicated vaccines?

Dr. Strang is of the generation when measles, along with chicken pox and mumps were considered mild infections and childhood rites of passage. They were acknowledged as an important challenge to the immune system, and imparted life-long immunity. Parents had neighbourhood parties.

Whereas Dr. Strang says there are “no treatments”

we have known since at least the 1960’s that adequate vitamin A and C and D are essential for successful weathering of measles, yet Dr. Strang has not mentioned these simple preventions and treatments. The back of a tin of cod liver oil, has no list of adverse events. Dr. Strang consistently promotes pharmaceuticals while ignoring adequate and abundant nutrition as a model for health.

Should parents trust the recommendations of this “Health Officer” given his appalling track record during COVID? During COVID Dr. Strang promoted and mandated the yet-under-emergency-status, highly experimental COVID vaccines for children and babies to age 6 months. This despite youngsters facing, is any, only mild reaction to the illness. He instituted sustained lock downs and mask-wearing, closed gyms and other contrary to health measures. Exemptions were virtually impossible to get and medical professionals were threatened with job loss, and reputation decimation if they did not promote his program and that of the W.H.O..

Now, he uselessly and dangerously keeps COVID shots on the childhood schedule, thus ignoring their poor benefit/risk, and ignoring the prevalence of adverse events.

Is Nova Scotia Health Authority a health authority?

We recommend that folks study what Leaders in Canada and Leaders around the World say in this document, as a start, to decide if this agency is up to date, transparent, free from industry influence, and promoting informed consent and therefore an authority on vaccination and programs of good health. We recommend folks practice questioning and take responsibility for their health research and decisions.